Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) Deals Happening for High School Student Athletes

In what appears to be a first for high school football, ESPN reports that Jaden Rashada, one of the top quarterback prospects in the Class of 2023 (ranked #26 in the ESPN 300) has signed a deal by which he will be paid to promote a recruiting smartphone app.  

This is a significant development in the wake of the NCAA’s policy change now allowing student athletes to enter into NIL deals, which was strictly prohibited prior to 2021.  That door is wide open at the collegiate level, and now apparently at the high school level to some degree. 

It is important to note however, that in some states - including Pennsylvania - the governing body that oversees high school sports prohibit these kinds of deals.  For example, the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association’s bylaws require student athletes to maintain amateur status in order to be eligible to participate in PIAA governed sporting events (which is essentially every organized high school sport).  

Article II of the PIAA Bylaws provides: 

Section 1. Amateur Status Required.

To be eligible to participate in an Inter-School Practice, Scrimmage, and/or Contest, a student must be an amateur in the sport involved. An amateur student is one who engages in athletic competition solely for the educational, physical, mental, social, and pleasure benefits derived thereof and does not receive monetary or similar or equivalent compensation or remuneration for such participation.

A student athlete loses his or her amateur status - and is then ineligible to participate if: 

C. The student plays on, or enters into a contract to play on, a professional team or as an individual professional athlete in that sport; or enters into a contract to represent a corporation, organization or similar entity in competition or by appearing in public on behalf of such entity.  

Bylaws, at Art. II, §2 (emphasis added). 

Thus, while NIL deals for high school athletes are beginning to appear across the country, parents of high school student athletes in Pennsylvania should be aware of the current PIAA rules.  Those rules may change in the future of course, and this will be an issue to watch develop in PA. 

Of course, NIL deals are permitted by Pennsylvania law for collegiate student athletes.

For more information, please contact Tuk Law Offices.

Friday Night Lights and the First Amendment

In this podcast episode, Attorney Tuk discusses the how sporting events at public schools provide the potential for free speech issues to play out right in your own home town. What rights do public school students have on public school grounds? Listen to this episode to find out.

CLICK HERE to subscribe to Creative Confidential: the Newsletter.

CLICK HERE to subscribe to the audio podcast.

#TakeTheKnee, Part II: Why the NFL Teams Must Allow the Protests to Continue

The NFL is subject to a Collective Bargaining Agreement, the most recent version of which went into effect in 2011.  The term of the current CBA is ten years and it will expire in 2021 (the "NFL CBA"). 

In the overwhelming response to my prior writings on the #TakeTheKnee controversy (the first article from 2016 here, and yesterday's post here) one astute commenter asked whether the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement has any impact on the NFL's official stance on player protests in uniform.

In short, a close reading of the NFL CBA shows exactly why the NFL has no choice but to let the players protest, at least within the confines of the 2017-2018 season.  

Read more

Free Speech, The NFL, The President & #TakeTheKnee

It was slightly over a year ago that I wrote about the new (at the time) controversy that was roiling the NFL, which was Colin Kaepernick's decision to take a knee during the playing of the National Anthem prior to the 49ers games.  The purpose of Mr. Kaepernick's actions was to draw attention to police brutality issues among other things.  The media and the talking heads on ESPN in particular seemingly couldn't stop talking about it.  

At the time, from a legal standpoint it was quite simply about the rights of an employee to voice their personal opinion in a very public way while working for a private employer.  The NFL, as you know, is not the US Government, nor is it a state or municipal government for that matter.  The NFL is a private entity, as are the 32 NFL franchises that employ the NFL players.   Because of this fact, there is no civil rights issue, and there is no free speech issue.  It is WELL settled that private employers can dictate employee conduct while the employees are on company time - for instance  when an NFL player is suited up on the field about to being playing a nationally televised game.  

Fast forward one year, and the debate has persisted.  Mr. Kaepernick was released by the San Francisco 49ers and and not been signed by another NFL team despite there being a clear need for starting caliber quarterbacks. 

Read more